#Acdsee pro 5 vs acdsee pro 10 upgrade
#Acdsee pro 5 vs acdsee pro 10 license
#Acdsee pro 5 vs acdsee pro 10 plus

Surprisingly I found ACDSee Pro the slowest for assigning categories, with Imatch being the fastest. If I try and assign the same image to multiple print sizes Imatch moves it to the new category and unassigns it from the old one. With Imatch I can set a rule that allows an image to only be in one of these print size categories. I have categories for 8x10, 11x14, 12x18 etc. For example I have images ready for printing at different sizes. loading thumbnails into database) in ACDSee Pro is painfully slow compared to Imatch.Д¬ategories in Imatch far more powerful than in any other app I have tried. During those two minutes my CPU is running at about 70% and everything is sluggish.ДЄCDSee Pro: The speed of building up an image catalog (i.e. In Idimager it takes about two minutes for the queue to hit 0 every time I click on it. In Imatch it takes about one second to load the category.

For example I have a category called Arizona that has 1200 images in it. So much so that it hard for me to use IdImager. IdImager: The overall speed of IdImager is much slower than Imatch. My conclusion is that both IdImager and ACDSee Pro show a lot of potential, but there are a few things that are keeping me from switching. I have been waiting two years for the new version of Imatch that is supposed to address most of my concerns and I am starting to lose patience. I have been testing out competing products to Imatch (IdImager and ACDSee Pro) to see if one of them is better and will be updated on a more regular basis.

#Acdsee pro 5 vs acdsee pro 10 plus

Things I dislike about Imatch are the interface, lack of built in version tracking, it does not import EXIF camera data into the database for quick searches, search function are too difficult to use, overall ease of use is not very good plus a few other things I can not think of now. I love the stability, speed, power of categories and scripting abilities (as a last resort) of Imatch. First, I have been using Imatch for the last two years and have always had a love/hate relationship with it. I think Glen is right although I suspect an Ultimate 11 may be due earlier than we think.I have been testing out IdImager, ACDSee Pro and Imatch the past few days and I thought I would pass on my conclusion.

Seems like if your camera kit is cheaper than the body only, for me. Well, if the bundle + all the extras (see the offer) is now cheaper than its parts. They are pretty aggressive in trying to improve their products. So far, each version since Pro 6 (where I started with their current products after leaving Lightroom) has kept on getting better and better. So they ALWAYS need more users, and there is ALWAYS a new version in the works! Usually there is a new version out in late September or early October each year. so it is worth a discount to acquire new users I would imagine that a large base of existing users who are highly motivated to keep their version as up-to-date as possible are the best sort of customers to have.

#Acdsee pro 5 vs acdsee pro 10 upgrade

I suspect the answer is, they want to get users using the ACDSee products and then have them upgrade every year or so. Pro) at the higher price per license? Do they need more Ultimate users? A new version coming? What I do not understand - looking at all the other offers of today: how are they going to sell other products (e.g.

#Acdsee pro 5 vs acdsee pro 10 license

Ultimate 10 on its own single license = $89.95 !!!!!ДЇrom what I see here. Ultimate pack including Ultimate 10 with 3 licenses = $69 until July 20th